stumbling into aerodynamics

Home Posts About Me

Posts

11/11/16 - Energy

The previous discussions about mass and momentum can inform discussion about work and energy. For energy, let's just start with this massive conservation of energy equation. $$\displaystyle \int \hspace{-1.7ex} \int \hspace{-1.7ex} \int _{\cal V}\frac{\partial }{\partial t}\left(\rho e_0\right)\, {\rm d}{\cal V}+ \int \hspace{-1.7ex} \int _{S} \rho e_0 \, {\bf V}\cdot \hat{{\bf n}}\, {\rm d}S = \displaystyle \int \hspace{-1.7ex} \int \hspace{-1.7ex} \int _{{\cal V}} \rho \, {\bf g}\cdot {\bf V}\, {\rm d}{\cal V}- \int \hspace{-1.7ex} \int _{S} p\, \hat{{\bf n}} \cdot {\bf V}\, {\rm d}S + \int \hspace{-1.7ex} \int _{S} \boldsymbol {\tau }\cdot {\bf V}\, {\rm d}S + \displaystyle \sum \left({\bf F}_{\rm ext} \cdot {\bf V}_{\rm ext}\right) - \int \hspace{-1.7ex} \int _ S \dot{{\bf q}}\cdot \hat{{\bf n}}\, {\rm d}S$$ This is admittedly an ungainly way of representing something that does not have to be so complicated.

This whole equation represents how different sources of energy work together in a control volume. If the air is completely still, we know that the energy is simply equal to the internal energy of the air molecules. If heat were applied to the control volume, there would be a negative heat flow, and the total energy would rise. The rise would originate on the right side of the equation with the heat flow term. The response on the left side would need to be a rise as well. This rise would be the result of an increase in the value of \(e_0\) because it encompasses the chemical and mechanical energy of the molecules which changes with heat.


--Aryn Harmon